TRADEMARK RAJASTHAN AUSHDHALAYA’S APPEAL DISMISSED Rajasthan Aushdhalaya Pvt. Ltd. appealed a decree passed by the Hon’ble Single Judge Bench of…
Lawyers
TRADEMARK TM PASSING OFF REQUIRES PROVEN GOODWILL IN INDIA The Delhi HC has ruled that a company must first establish…
TRADEMARK LENSKART CLAIMS USE OF TITAN TRADEMARK ACCIDENTAL Indian eyewear brand Lenskart acknowledged the use of Titan Company Limited’s registered…
TRADEMARK MILMA AWARDED ₹1 CRORE AS DAMAGES Kerala Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation (Plaintiff) established in 1980, filed a suit in…
TRADEMARK BOMBAY HC REFUSES WELL-KNOWN STATUS TO TIK-TOK TikTok Limited (Petitioner) filed a petition in the Bombay HC challenging the…
TRADEMARK ‘RITZ’ AND ‘RITZ-CARLTON’ DECLARED AS WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARKS Luxury hospitality giants, Ritz Hotel Ltd. (owner of The Ritz Paris), the…
TRADEMARK BRIEF CONSUMER CONFUSION IS ENOUGH TO PROVE TM INFRINGEMENT In a significant ruling on trademark protection, the Delhi HC…
TRADEMARK DELHI HC RULES IN FAVOUR OF PARALLEL IMPORTS In a landmark decision, the Delhi HC has affirmed the right…
TRADEMARK DELHI HC GRANTS RELIEF TO GERMAN SOCIETY Goethe-Institut, a German society (Plaintiff) operating German language centers in India under…
TRADEMARK BOMBAY HC STAYS FILM WITH TITLE “KARAN JOHAR” The Bombay HC has upheld a decision by a single judge,…